PA
PARK AEROSPACE CORP (PKE)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 FY25 revenue was $16.94M, up vs Q3 ($14.41M) and slightly above Q4 FY24 ($16.33M); gross margin improved to 29.3% as production exceeded sales (SVP +$1.4M) and finished goods were rebuilt by ~$1M .
- GAAP EPS was $0.06 (down YoY on tax items), while EPS before special items rose to $0.12; Adjusted EBITDA increased to $3.42M, within the company’s prior range and above Q3 ($2.42M) .
- Management announced a major manufacturing expansion ($35M ±$5M) to add solution treater, hot-melt film/tape, and a hypersonic materials line; funded with cash, with management emphasizing “very significant” ROI and cash flow potential .
- Defense mix advancing: $4.4M of C2B fabric sold in Q4 (FY25 total $7.5M) with requalification testing for a key customer expected to conclude around end-May; ablative sales using C2B resumed ($0.42M in Q4) with high incremental margins .
- For Q1 FY26, management forecast sales of $15–$16M and EBITDA of $2.5–$3.0M, including ~$1.2M of low-margin C2B fabric; quarterly dividend of $0.125/share was declared for May 2, 2025 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Production exceeded sales by ~$1.4M SVP, dropping “probably $350,000 or more” to the bottom line; finished goods inventory was rebuilt by about $1M vs Q3, supporting margin improvement to 29.3% .
- C2B-related activity remained strong: $4.4M of fabric sales in Q4 and $0.42M of ablative materials using C2B fabric, with management noting the ablative margins are “significant and bold” .
- Strategic momentum: announced a ~$35M expansion (solution treater, hot-melt film/tape, hypersonic line) with “very significant” ROI, and lightning strike protection certified for Passport 20 (≈$0.5M/yr run-rate later in 2025) .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP net income fell YoY due to tax items: a $2.147M non-cash tax charge related to potential repatriation from Singapore, partly offset by a $0.957M tax benefit; GAAP EPS decreased to $0.06 from $0.13 .
- Mix headwind from low‑margin C2B fabric sales persisted; management highlighted selling C2B fabric at a “small markup” burdens the P&L, even as demand remained high .
- Ongoing external constraints: engine/supply chain issues (e.g., Airbus “gliders”) and tariff uncertainty; although Park has seen “no impact” to date, management is monitoring and passing through where needed .
Financial Results
P&L summary vs prior periods
Company forecast vs actual (Q4 FY25)
Selected KPIs and operating items
Segment breakdown: not disclosed; Park reports and discusses at the company level .
Guidance Changes
Note: Management generally “does not do guidance,” but provides quarterly forecasts in presentations/calls; they emphasized integrity of forecasts vs “padding” .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We don’t do guidance…when we give you a forecast, we’re saying this is what we think will happen” .
- “In Q4, our production exceeded our sales…by $1.4 million…That drops a lot of dollars to the bottom line, probably $350,000 or more” .
- “We sold $4.4 million of C2B fabric in Q4…$7.5 million in all of ’25…Park sold $420,000 of ablative materials manufactured with C2B fabric in Q4…Our margin…[on ablatives] are significant” .
- “Park is planning a major new expansion…capital budget $35 million plus or minus $5 million…Our long‑term business forecast requires it…ROI, very significant” .
- “Tariffs…there has been no impact to our business…we updated quotes to pass them along where needed” .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariffs/macro: No direct impact so far; Park preemptively updated order confirmations/quotes to pass through where needed; inventory helped bridge near‑term inputs .
- Engines/supply chain: Airbus has produced “gliders”; expectation that engine output shifts from spares to new aircraft in 2H, aiding deliveries; timing still uncertain .
- Expansion rationale: Proceeding before Juggernaut fully materializes to avoid capacity shortfalls; planning 5–10 years out; confident opportunities justify capacity .
Estimates Context
- Street consensus from S&P Global: Not available for EPS and revenue for Q4 FY25; the S&P dataset did not return consensus values for these metrics, so we benchmarked results vs company forecasts instead (company does not issue formal guidance) . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Company forecasts vs actual: Revenue beat the high end ($16.94M vs $15.5–$16.3M), and Adjusted EBITDA landed within the $3.3–$3.9M range .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Mix and execution improved: Production > sales and inventory rebuild drove a 290 bps QoQ gross margin lift to 29.3%; watch for further margin normalization as ablative shipments resume post‑Requal .
- Defense optionality: C2B demand is robust (fabric stockpiling), and ablatives carry high incremental margins; successful requalification could be a step‑function tailwind .
- Capacity as a differentiator: The $35M expansion positions Park for Juggernaut and defense growth; management signals “very significant” ROI funded with cash—an attractive capital deployment pivot .
- Near‑term setup: Q1 FY26 forecast embeds ~$1.2M of low‑margin C2B fabric, holding back EBITDA; monitor conversion to high‑margin ablatives as testing completes .
- External watch items: Engine supply cadence to Airbus/COMAC (potential for delivery acceleration) and tariff developments (mitigated so far) .
- Capital returns intact: Regular $0.125 quarterly dividend maintained; buybacks have been active historically and remain a lever subject to cash priorities .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Citations:
- Q4 FY25 press release with detailed financials and reconciliations:
- Q4 FY25 8‑K Item 2.02 and exhibit:
- Q4 FY25 earnings call transcript (operations, strategy, forecasts):
- Q3 FY25 press release/call (trend, prior forecast):
- Q2 FY25 press release (trend):
- Dividend declaration (Q4 FY25):